Why the M1 Abrams Tank is Still King of the Battlefield

Why the M1 Abrams Tank is Still King of the Battlefield

Warrior Maven Video Above: Guided, More-Precise .50-Cal Weapons Can Take Out Enemy Drones

By Alex Lockie, Business Insider

Since first coming into service in 1980, the M1 Abrams tank has become a staple of US ground forces. The 67-ton behemoth has since made a name for itself as an incredibly tough, powerful tool that has successfully transitioned from a Cold War-era blunt instrument to a tactical modern weapon.

In the slides below, find out how the M1 Abrams became, and remains, the king of the battlefield.

Here is one of the first M1 Abrams in 1979. The Abrams entered service in 1980, but didn't see heavy combat until Desert Storm in 1991.

DoD photo by: EDDIE McCROSSAN

The Abrams was the first tank to incorporate British-developed Chobham composite armor, which includes ceramics and is incredibly dense.

Ultimate Factories/National Geographic Television And Film

Despite the British-designed armor, the Abrams tanks were made in Ohio and Michigan.

Ultimate Factories/National Geographic Television And Film

Source: GlobalSecurity.org

The Abrams is highly mobile, with a top speed of more than 40 mph and an impressive zero-turn radius.

Source: Federation of American Scientists

Also, in special conditions like loose sand, dirt, or packed snow, the Abrams can actually drift.

The M1 Abrams sports a 120 mm smooth-bore cannon capable of firing a variety of rounds.

US Army photo by Maj. Adam Weece

Like with any armored unit, their success depends partly on the hardware and partly on the crew. Here, a loader expertly queues up a round capable of melting through an enemy tank's armor.

In addition to the main cannon, the Abrams sports a M2H Browning .50-caliber machine gun, a staple of the US military since World War II. In some cases, the guns can be remotely fired.

US Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Cody Haas

The M1 Abrams is just plain tough. Watch it roll over a car bomb without even closing the hatch. This would tear a lesser tank to shreds.

The US as well as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Australia use the Abrams as their main battle tank.

US Army photo by Sgt. Marcus Fichtl, 2nd ABCT PAO, 4th Inf. Div.

When the Abrams finally saw combat in 1991, it impressed operators with it's effective rounds and virtual invulnerability to Iraqi tank fire. No Abrams was destroyed by Iraqi tank fire during the Persian Gulf War.

PHC D. W. HOLMES II, US Navy

Source: US General Accounting Office

In fact, the only Abrams lost during the Persian Gulf War were destroyed by friendly fire, sometimes on purpose so they couldn't be reclaimed by Iraqi forces.

US Department of Defense

The Abrams benefited from having superior range and night-vision abilities compared to their Soviet-made counterparts.

Ultimate Factories/National Geographic Television And Film

During the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Abrams became involved in urban warfare while clearing cities. Urban warfare is the worst situation for tanks, as their range is limited by buildings and they can be attacked from above, where their armor is weakest.

US Army, Staff Sgt. Aaron Allmon II

Source: USA Today

In response, the US outfitted the Abrams with the Tank Urban Survival Kit, which greatly improved survivability in urban areas.

US Military

Source: USA Today

In his book "Heavy Metal: A Tank Company's Battle to Baghdad" Maj. Jason Conroy reports a lopsided victory where an Abrams unit destroyed seven Soviet-made T-72 tanks at point-blank range with no losses on the US side.

US Army photo by 1st Lt. Austin McGuin

Source: Amazon

Today, the Abrams remains the US's main battle tank, one of the most successful tanks of all time, and the king of the battlefield.

US Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Justin T. Updegraff

SEE ALSO: Ukrainian soldiers made this epic video using a battle-tank turret as a selfie stick

More from Business Insider:

This article originally appeared on Business Insider. Follow @BusinessInsider on Twitter

More Weapons and Technology -WARRIOR MAVEN (CLICK HERE)--

Comments