Army Seeks 2,000 New Air Dropped Fast-Attack Vehicles

The Army plans to receive its first prototypes from three vehicle-makers as soon as this year

"To Join Warrior Maven Gold AI & CyberWar Circle CLICK HERE

Warrior Video Above: Army's New Fast-Attack Vehicle Changes Ground-Recon strategy

By Kris Osborn - Warrior Maven

(Washington, D.C.) If a large mechanized unit of armored ground forces were “closing” with an enemy amid heavy artillery and cannon fire - but did not have overhead aircraft or satellite surveillance while transiting rigorous terrain - how could they fully discern the source of incoming fire? How might they pursue the safest and most lethal method of attack?

This kind of scenario represents one of many contingencies now informing the Army’s development of a new Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV), a super high-speed, maneuverable lightweight vehicle being engineered to perform a wide sphere of combat missions; these include high-speed straight-on attacks, forward operating reconnaissance or scout units, coordinated air-dropped ground assault and multiple entry point integrated operations.

Perhaps long-range ground sensors are obscured, hacked or disabled, air support is compromised, or GPS signals are jammed -- how might an advancing ground force attack a major-power enemy? Fast-moving, soldier-led ground reconnaissance might be the best ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) options for the attacking force. A mission of this kind would of course be improved by using air-dropped transport for ground squads able to transport forward-operating infantry across multiple-points of entry.

The service is now refining its requirements for the vehicle, intended among other things to enable units to “change patterns of operations faster than the enemy can respond,” Army developers explain.

“Mobility coupled with speed enables units to avoid enemy strong points, quickly exploit battlefield success, reinforce threatened positions, and rapidly deploy infantry,” Al Howard, Capability Development Specialist, Maneuver Capabilities Development and Integration Directorate, told Warrior in a written statement.

The Army plans to receive its first prototypes from three vehicle-makers as soon as this year to begin a process of evaluation, operational assessment and combat performance. In late August, the Army picked Oshkosh Defense/Flyer, General Motors Defense and Polaris/SAIC to build two prototype vehicles each as a step toward having an operational ISV by as soon as next year.

According to Army requirements, the vehicle must be able to sling-load beneath a UH-60 Blackhawk or fit inside a CH-47 Chinook. This kind of versatility seems entirely consistent with the Army’s growing emphasis upon rapid deployability and expeditionary operations.

GM Defense photo

Interestingly, a chapter in a very recent 2018 Army University Press publication book called “Deep Maneuver - Historical Case Studies of Maneuver in Large-Scale Combat Operations,” specifically discusses the need for long-range, dismounted ground reconnaissance units in a great-power war era scenario. The book, Edited by Jack D. Kem, explores shifting Army doctrine, strategy and tactics as the service pivots from 15 years of counterinsurgency toward a great-power warfare combat focus.

Considering “dismounted reconnaissance,” a chapter in the book called “Dismounted Reconnaissance in the Division and Corps Deep Area,” states that the Army deactivated special long-range ground surveillance detachments as of 2017. However, the chapter, written by Maj. Brandon Terry, cites a modern need for ground recon units to operate in major warfare circumstances where other ISR possibilities may not exist.

“While the dedicated (ground recon) unit may no longer exist in the conventional force, the need for the capability endures and could be needed in future large-scale combat operations against peers challenging and disrupting other reconnaissance methods,” Terry writes.

It goes without saying that the ISV does indeed align with this kind of strategic focus -- by seeking new deployable, high-tech, high-speed forward reconnaissance vehicles intended to transport dismounted infantry squad-missions. The vehicle is being built to transport an entire 9-man squad.

Terry’s chapter in the book begins with a relevant and interesting quote about the importance of dismounted reconnaissance.

…..Only he can go places where the infrared or the aerial camera cannot go…—Colonel Harold R. Aaron

Given its historical focus, the Army University Press text includes a chapter on Hitler’s WWII Blitzkrieg wherein Panzer tanks rapidly advanced straight through enemy lines. These kinds of rapid advances of course at times followed input from dismounted recon units tasked with finding the enemy’s most vulnerable points for attack. The need for forward ground-mobile recon in major power war is well documented, and Army strategist believe it is just as if not more crucial in a modern, high-tech battlefield with drones, surveillance planes, GPS and long-range fires.

Flyer Defense photo

Army weapons developers further described the ISV mission in terms of enabling flexibility for entry operations to counter threats “through the use of multiple entry points via air-drop, air-land or air-insertion,” Steven Herrick, product lead, Ground Mobility Vehicle, Program Executive Office, Combat Support & Combat Service Support, told Warrior in a written statement.

Sure enough, Herrick’s point about combat maneuver, “repositioning” and multiple-entry attacks is mirrored by the Army’s FM 3-98 Reconnaissance and Security Operations doctrine, cited by Terry’s essay. This Army doctrine, as described in the text, lists some of the key fundamentals of recon, to include “gaining and maintaining enemy contact,” not keeping recon units in reserve and retaining “freedom of maneuver.”

The anticipated delivery date for all three competing teams is Nov. 13, 2019 to Aberdeen Test Center (ATC), Md., Army developers said. Ultimately, the Army plans to acquire more than 2,000 ISVs.

“Once vehicles arrive at ATC in November, all production prototypes will complete various performance, operational and characteristics tests, expected through December 2019, Following the testing at ATC, the vehicles will be moved to Fort Bragg, N.C., (anticipated in January 2020) for operationalized assessments via a Soldier Touch Point,”Herrick said.

Not surprisingly, the ISV is intended to support Infantry Brigade Combat Teams to supplement and potentially replace the service’s existing A-GMV 1.1.

“Any piece of equipment carried by a soldier is aligned at the squad level; tripods for crew-served weapons, rucksack and equipment for mountaineering,” Mathew Walker, Senior Capability Developer, Soldier Lethality Cross-Functional Team.

***************

Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army - Acquisition, Logistics& Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

--- Kris Osborn, Managing Editor of WARRIORMAVEN (CLICK HERE) can be reached at krisosborn.ko@gmail.com--

Comments (3)
No. 1-3
Karl -Moderator
Karl -Moderator

Is there any chance this fast, lightweight vehicles could be vulnerable? Karl Warrior Moderator

TrustbutVerify
TrustbutVerify

Of course it is vulnerable! Just like the old Willys or the Humvees....they were meant to be a quicker way of getting ground troops around to keep up with mechanized/armored formations in support. They weren't mean to BE armor. But, sure enough, Humvees had to be uparmored like they were supposed to a an APC or something. So what is the difference with this? Troops will get shot at or a IED will get one and we'll be back in the same PR exercise of adding armor to something that was never meant to have it.

Warrior  Maven
Warrior Maven

Editor

I think you make a great point, as these small USVs will seek to use speed and maneuverability to operate in higher threat environments. Yet, at the same time, they clearly are not built for forward attack in a heavily mechanized force-on-force war - they are more likely to be dropped into lower threat environments for recon - where they are not as much in a postition to take heavy enemy fire. Also, many are likely to agree with you that simply adding armor will not work for the USV: not only will it slow the vehicle down but attempt to equip the vehilce for misisons it was not intended to perform -- Joe, Warrior Maven Moderator