DARPA: Is Stealth Tech Approaching its Limits?

“Platform stealth may be approaching physical limits,” says DARPA.

***Warrior Maven Video Above - New F-22 Weapons Breakdown***

A new report makes some stunning claims.

byMichael Peck

Did the Pentagon just admit that stealth technology may not work anymore? Or that America must be ready to face a future where its airpower doesn't control the skies?

DARPA, the Pentagon's cutting-edge research agency, has quietly raised these possibilities as it searches for future technology to fight the next war.And stealth technology may not be the answer.

Platform stealth may be approaching physical limits, says DARPA.

The agency also admits that our acquisition system is finding it difficult to respond on relevant timescales to adversary progress, which has made the search for next-generation capabilities at once more urgent and more futile.

If thats the case, then the next generation of aircraftthe designs that will eventually replace the F-22, F-35 and B-2 stealth aircraftmay not be any stealthier than their predecessors. Or, in the endless race between stealth technology and the sensors that seek to penetrate its veil, stealth may have hit a brick wall.

Recommended:How the Air Force Would Destroy North Korea

Recommended:10 Reasons No Nation Wants to Fight Israel

Thus, DARPA has to ask a question that America has never really had to contemplate before. Are there acceptable alternatives to air dominance? DARPA asks. Is it possible to achieve Joint Force objectives without clearing the skies of enemy fighters and bombers, and eliminating all surface-based threats? Can this be achieved without placing a high-value, sophisticated platform and crew at riskreducing leverage potential adversaries currently hold over the U.S.?

DARPA says it wants to see if it's possible to go beyond evolutionary advances in stealth technology and disrupt traditional doctrines of air dominance/air supremacy?

But the traditional U.S. way of war since 1941 has been to seek control of the skies: though there have been rough patches, such as the Pacific War in 1941 and the Bomber Offensive over Germany in 194344, America has largely succeeded in clearing the skies of enemy planes and filling them with its own. Few Americans alive today have ever been bombed by aircraft, which is more than Americas enemies can say.

But those days are gone, as Russia and now China are developing stealth aircraft and lethal anti-aircraft missiles.

Now, DARPA is looking for other ways that U.S airpower can accomplish its objectives even without air superiority, such as lethality through a combination of overwhelming performance (e.g. hypersonics) and overwhelming numbers (e.g. swarming low-cost weapons).

Indeed, the Pentagon's pet research agency seems to be taking a swipe at the concept of small numbers of expensive aircraft like the F-35 stealth fighter and B-2 stealth bomber when it calls for reduced reliance on increasingly complex, monolithic platforms.

Similarly, how can we reduce reliance on large, expensive, and increasingly vulnerable carrier strike group platforms? DARPA asks.

Comments