Blue Lives Matter

VIDEO: Sovereign Shoots Cop In Back For Telling Him Toddler Can't Drive

A Casper police officer remains hospitalized in critical condition after being shot in the back.

Casper, WY – A man who considered himself to be a sovereign citizen repeatedly shot a Casper police officer in the back on Sunday afternoon, leading to a gunfight with police (video below).

The unnamed officer was hospitalized with “life threatening injuries,” the Casper Star Tribune reported.

The gunman was fatally shot when police returned fire.

The incident began at 1:36 p.m., when police received a call that a man was allowing children – one as young as three years old – to drive a motor vehicle in a vacant dirt lot.

Two Casper police officers arrived at the scene, and told 38-year-old David Wolosin to stop the vehicle, a witness told the Casper Star Tribune.

Wolosin refused to speak to the officers, and instead made a phone call. He then stepped away from the officers, before he turned and opened fire on them without warning.

“During that contact, the male unexpectedly drew a firearm and engaged the officers in gunfire,” the Casper Police Department said in a statement, according to The Washington Post. “The two officers returned gunfire.”

As the officers sought cover behind Wolosin’s vehicle, the gunman shot one of the officers in the back five times, the Casper Star Tribune reported.

Cellphone footage showed the officers exchanging gunfire with Wolosin, as he laid on his side in the open dirt lot.

Wolosin was fatally shot during the gunfight, and died at the scene.

The children, who remained inside Wolosin’s vehicle during the altercation, were uninjured.

“It was a pretty surreal thing.,” Travis Barker, who witnessed the incident, told KCWY. “Maybe 15-20 shots and it was over.”

The unnamed officer was rushed to the hospital with “life-threatening injuries,” and received multiple blood transfusions, the Casper Star Tribune reported.

He remains in critical condition.

Attorney Don Fuller, who often represents police officers in officer-involved shooting incidents, said that Wolosin “fancied himself as a sovereign,” and refused to recognize the authority of the government.

“That’s what we know so far,” Fuller said. “These officers were left with no choice, and they acted heroically.”

The Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation was handling the officer-involved shooting investigation, and surrounding agencies provided assistance in handling calls for the Casper police department, city officials said in a press release.

A member of the Casper Police Department has established a fundraising account to assist with the injured officer’s medical expenses, the department said in a Facebook post.

“CPD appreciates all the support the community is showing us during this trying time!” the post read.

The campaign had raised nearly $30,000 as of Tuesday morning.

You can watch cellphone footage of the gunfight in the video below. WARNING - Graphic Content:

Comments
View Newer Messages
Burgers Allday
Burgers Allday

I only post similar comments so many times because so many police officers (and regular people too) are getting shot, and every time it occurs to me that the tragedy might have been prevented with the right type of gun control. I am not saying that every last shooting would be prevented, but, statistically speaking, a lot of them would, and it helps to have the names and backstories of some of those officers that could have been spared injury, or even death, with better gun control law. Because Blue Lives Matter!

K9smatter
K9smatter

@Burgers Allday...Seems like your keyboard is programmed for the exact same, canned response for EVERY comment! Do you not know how to spell any other words, or do you not comprehend the differences in the diverse situations?

John-Brown
John-Brown

I believe the original call was for children driving a motor vehicle. Based on my experience, after making contact, one of the first questions from the officers was probably, "Is this your property?". After the obvious "No" from this POS, the rest unfolded as it did. There is no overreach by the police. Nobody is violating the Constitution. Police are allowed to enter someone's property to investigate a reported offense. And the use of the word "curtilage" doesn't seem to even apply here. And even if it did, police are still allowed to enter it to investigate the report of a crime.

GerryNance
GerryNance

It looks like an unfenced, open field, well traveled by vehicles and safe enough to drive on. Had it been an fully fenced and gated ENCLOSURE with signs, then I might see trespassing. But, to your trespass claim, would police be called if the kids were not behind the wheel? Do you reach trespass by mere presence of the car or do you add trespass to other behaviors? I'll bet trespass wasn't reported the moment of entry onto the curtilage.

godsmack
godsmack

GerryNance. He was not on his own property. That was the problem. So yes, he was in violation.

GerryNance
GerryNance

The vehicle was offroad and a parent was allowing children to drive. I have introduces kids to driving, same as a farmer would allow a child to drive a John Deere tractor. To remove the anxiety. What codes were the officers enforcing offroad? Why can't government allow parents to parent? Does the state own the people's children? Sad it ended as it did, but the parent holds the rights to raise their children. FYI -- I am not a sovereign citizen, I served in the military. I am not hostile to cops who don't infringe on my liberty, but I do not support a police state in a constitutional republic. When a government acts outside the constitution, it abdicates its power to govern and may be abolished per the Declaration of Independence.

ScottyWM
ScottyWM

LAWJAMS, Are you on drugs?