U.S. Congressman Pushing Change To Block States From Banning Cops Carrying Guns

Sandy Malone

U.S. Rep. Don Bacon plans to introduce important LEOSA amendments in the next Congress.

Washington, DC – A congressman from Nebraska is ready to introduce new amendments to the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act (LEOSA) that will shut down lasting attempts by some states to limit the coverage of that law within their own borders.

U.S. Representative Don Bacon (R-Nebraska) introduced a few amendments to LEOSA that died with the end of the 115th Congress, but he’s already prepared with a bigger, better version.

“We have been made aware of various LEOSA abuses by states regarding implementation of this federal law and I will be introducing legislation in the 116th Congress to make improvements to LEOSA as identified by a coalition of law enforcement organizations,” Bacon told Blue Lives Matter.

Bacon’s proposed amendments will come as no surprise to many, particularly on the East Coast where states like New Jersey and New York have over-complicated routine travel for those specifically covered by LEOSA.

"Upon introduction, our changes to the LEOSA Reform Act in the 116th Congress will allow our law enforcement officers who have dedicated their lives to protect our communities, to continue doing so by extending their concealed carry privileges," the congressman said. "Allowing trained professionals with years of expertise to carry could allow them to respond more quickly to emergencies, and makes our communities safer."

"I know if I was in a crisis situation, I’d be relieved to have a retired officer near me who is trained and ready react safely," he said.

Bacon and his coalition seek to make the following changes:

  1. Federal Gun Free School Zones Act (GFSZA) - The GFSZA currently does not permit carry for those pursuant to LEOSA even though possessing a state CCW permit does. Thus, having a state CCW means you can carry in school zones but carrying under LEOSA does not. We wish to revise the GFSZA to include an exemption for LEOSA.
  2. State, Local, and Property Open to the Public, including Common Carriers - LEOSA currently does not override the prohibition of CCW carry on common carriers (e.g. city buses, subways, AMTRAK, etc.), nor does it override the ability of private property owners of otherwise publicly accessible property (e.g. shopping malls, stores, movie theaters, etc.) from prohibiting carry. We wish to revise LEOSA to allow qualified law enforcement officers (QLEOs) and qualified retired law enforcement officers (QRLEOs) to carry on common carriers and on state, local, and privately-owned property that is otherwise open to the public. (Courthouses and Law Enforcement facilities would continue to be restricted, as would carry for commercial airlines.)
  3. National Parks - LEOSA currently does not permit carry in National Parks but having a state CCW permit does. We wish to revise LEOSA to specifically allow carry on all federally owned lands/properties that are otherwise open to the public.
  4. Magazine size limitation - LEOSA currently provides an exemption from state/local restrictions on ammunition, but it does not provide an exemption from such restrictions on magazine size. Thus, one can carry hollow-point ammo under LEOSA even if it is prohibited by state/local laws, but LEOSA does not allow an exemption on magazine size limitations. We wish to revise LEOSA to also provide the magazine size exemption.
  5. Qualification Issue - LEOSA certification currently requires annual qualification to the state standard for law enforcement or on the qualification standard of their former employing agency. This is a problem for those who reside in states for which there is no state standard for law enforcement, those states that have different standards for active versus retired law enforcement, and those states that prohibit their certified firearms instructors from qualifying retired officers. We seek to revise LEOSA to provide multiple options for meeting the annual qualification requirement and at the option of the state, extend the training requirement from every 12 months—to up to every 36 months.
  6. Certain Federal Facilities – LEOSA currently does not allow carry in Federal civilian public access facilities. We wish to revise LEOSA to allow carry in a Facility Security Level I or II civilian public access facility (e.g. US Post Offices and Social Security offices, etc.) (Federal Courthouses would continue to be restricted).”

Bacon’s proposed amendments are broader than those that died with his last bill.

The new amendments address some specific issues that have come up in states that have sought to violate the spirit of LEOSA by restricting retired and active-duty officers carrying at will.

“Our coalition’s members, who are often retired law enforcement living in various states around the nation, are the individuals impacted by this law and notify us when they encounter problems with it,” Bacon explained.

The coalition backing Bacon’s proposed amendments is made up of the Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI (SFSAFBI/SFSAF), the Federal Law Enforcement Officer Association (FLEOA), the Association of Former Agents of the U.S. Secret Service (AFAUSSS), the FBI Agents Association (FBIAA), the National Organization of Police Organizations (NAPO), the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives (NOBLE), the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), and the NYPD Sergeants Benevolent Association (SBA).

The changes to LEOSA that Bacon and his coalition are proposing mostly serve as clarifications in what has become a never-ending effort to codify what the framers of the original bill had in mind when it was crafted.

The original LEOSA legislation passed in 2004 allowed "qualified law enforcement officers" and the "qualified retired or separated law enforcement officers" to carry a concealed firearm in any jurisdiction in the United States, regardless of state or local laws, with certain exceptions.

The initial law unintentionally left open for interpretation exactly which officers individual states deemed to be “qualified” under LEOSA, and what kind of ammunition they could carry.

So in 2010, amendments were passed that extended and defined the coverage and requirements, paving the way for a larger group of active-duty and retired officers to carry under LEOSA.

They also expanded the definition of a permitted firearm to include any ammunition not prohibited by the National Firearms Act of 1934, thus shutting down New Jersey’s attempt to limit the carrying of hollow-point bullets.

Congress further expanded LEOSA with amendments in 2013 that extended its coverage to active-duty and retired military police.

The bill Bacon intends to introduce in the new Congress addresses specific state issues, or conflicts in the law, that have arisen.

Most recently, a New Jersey law went into effect that limits the size of magazines to 10 rounds or fewer, and the state indicated it also applied to those carrying under LEOSA.

Bacon’s amendment would solve the issue by exempting LEOSA carriers from magazine-size restrictions.

Comments (15)
No. 1-6

I agree with what the bill is trying to do, however I'm a CCW holder, a retired Security officer and a SASS Club member. As a SASS Club member we shoot at least once a month, which is more often than any LEO does and that is at the local, state or federal level, so how about including us security officers. It would be nice to have National reciprocity in all States that have CCW licenses, especially states like California, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, New York City, and Massachusetts, as well as your state's ammunition and magazine laws. Unfortunately the Democrats in the House of Representatives will never let that pass. And good luck getting it past the Democrats in Senate.


Leo's should automatically have Nation Wide CCW, but we law-abiding CCW holders should be granted the same right. If I am able to obtain a CCW in my home state, then it should be enough to travel throughout all states and territories. Our drivers' licenses are recognized by all fifty and we don't even have a right to drive per our BoA but we do have a right to bear arms per it.


Hat's off to this guy. We need this but I also agree there should be mandatory training, held more often. We all know, most agencies are reactive not proactive when it comes to training. I've excepted the fact, years ago, to pay for training.


It is unacceptable to me period. ALL LEO'S should be allowed to carry period, as their job is saving lives. Their jobs these days are so much more deadly and dangerous and they are even facing charges for just DOING THEIR JOB! THAT #1. #2. THE 2nd Amendment is no more. It's done, finished, kaput. Guilty until proven innocent to add insult to injury. It is and always has been my God given right to protect myself. All my neighbors are illegal Honduran men and if I'm in my shed or watering my flowers it's/they are in plain view. I don't break the law so anybody coming to my house to take themfor no reason will have a fight on their hands. Fuck Democrats. Leo's have my full admiration and support!


Respectfully, ChiefC is incorrect. Bacon will not be introducing his NEW proposal until Congress reconvenes in 2019.


It is absurd to me that our Federal lawmakers created a Federal Law (HR-218 LEOSA) that allows retired law enforcement to carry a concealed firearm under Federal Law in any state and yet we can’t carry our concealed firearms in Federal Buildings within Washington DC. I went to the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum on Saturday only to be rejected entry, because I was armed. Seams only fair if you are going to supersede state law with a Federal Law you might want to support the Federal Law in a Federal Building.