Ohio Student Suspended For Refusing To Participate In Gun Walkout

A student did not want to take part in the gun walkout politics, so he was suspended.

Hilliard, OH – A Ohio high school student said he was suspended for a day because he stayed in his classroom and refused to join the national walk-out protests with the anti-gun crowd, or go with the pro-gun students to the a study hall.

High school senior Jacob Shoemaker said that his school wasn’t a place for politics and he wasn’t taking sides in the national debate when he refused to walk out on March 14, according to the Cincinnati Enquirer.

The Hilliard City School District said that it is responsible for students’ safety and that students can’t be unsupervised.

Scott Shoemaker, Jacob Shoemaker’s father, posted on Facebook about his son’s suspension.

“My son was suspended for not leaving the room to either join a demonstration or reporting to the commons,” the father wrote. “He was uncomfortable going to either location as he thought that going outside would most likely be politicizing a horrific event which he wanted no part of, but staying inside would make him look disrespectful or insensitive to 17 innocent victims if it turned out to be more of a memorial service.”

“This had nothing to do with his own political beliefs, but with politics in school in general. Students should not have been forced to choose a side,” Scott Shoemaker continued. “He got support from students on both sides of the political aisle after returning today [March 16], but he felt there were many other students and staff angry with him.”

According to the Massillon newspaper The Independent, Jacob told his father about his thoughts before going to school.

The father quoted his son as saying, “The biggest problem, Dad, is that there shouldn’t be politics in the classroom... I may just sit in my seat. As far as I’m concerned, that’s the least intrusive of the choices I’ve been given.”

The boy told his father there were other students who felt that way.

Hilliard district spokeswoman Stacie Raterman told The Independent that he knew the consequences ahead of time.

She said about 10 students were disciplined for lingering outside after the protests.

“I can say that our students were given two options: one, attend the gathering or two, have a study hall,” Raterman said in an email to The Independent. “We are responsible for the safety of our students; we can’t allow students to be unsupervised. The study hall was our way of making sure our students were safe and supervised."

“In any situation,” she continued, “we would explain to a student the choices, and explain what the consequences would be if they chose a different option. We would never blindside a student with a suspension without having a purposeful conversation ahead of time.”

Comments (15)
View Older Messages
Bonn10480
Bonn10480

Im glad i homeschool my kids. And why didnt they do like when we vote for presdental elections. We have a choice to chose either sides or be indepedent. They should of made it where if kids didnt want to be progun or against it. Tbey had a choice to chose neither!!!!!

EODK9Trainer
EODK9Trainer

There is a little more to the story. The school wanted to just get the kids not participating all in one area which I see no issues with but he refused to do this.

angryAmerican
angryAmerican

The school was demanding the students choose a side and THIS guy chose to not! I was always against this waste of taxpayer funds to use kids as a media tool, instead of holding themselves accountable for stopping the bullying and isolating of students! School shootings are never about the gun availability, but all about the mindset and history of the shooter!

grob51
grob51

If a student refused to join in a political protest, because politics is not the reason kids are attending school, then a teacher, should have stayed behind and done their job by teaching, and not playing the political jerk they so fondly love to call all those that disagree with them. I remember a quote, "Those that can, do, and those that can't, teach". Well looks like they can't do either, so now in order to keep their jobs, they play the propaganda puppet. The teachers that attended should have been suspended, including the school board, for placing the children in harms way, and not having them in a safe place. You are negligent in every way. Although school is not safe, due to the Communists and Socialists that are taking over this country by indoctrinating the youth, just like Hitler.

nuccten
nuccten

I'm with the school on this one. For someone who didn't want to be political, he sure managed to be.

Elisezca
Elisezca

How about the option of going to class? Do you think that would be the most appropriate option at school?

pixiepup
pixiepup

I agree. Why were the teachers going? That’s not their job!!

GregoryThomas
GregoryThomas

He was peacefully protesting the protest. Which is a protect action. Sue the school kid.

SueCoop
SueCoop

Before you use that simple-minded little phrase about those who can, do. Each year we have hoards of people with degrees who are fed up with the corporate world who think that it will be so much easier to teach, so they start teaching. I can't tell you how many I have seen quit before the first reporting period, and how many make it till the end of the year telling me that it is the absolute hardest job that they have ever had.No, those who can teach and teach very well until controlled by administrators, local school boards, state boards, and the Department of Education. They have ruined teaching and those called to teach are fed up. I simply would not have left my classroom unless threatened with a bad evaluation and possible loss of my job because of what they would call my "insubordination" if I refused to abandon my classroom as directed. Try teaching for a year.