Blue Lives Matter

Officer Indicted For Murder After Dept. Clears Him For Shooting Armed Suspect

Officer William Darby has been indicted for murder after he was cleared by his department.

Huntsville, AL - A Huntsville police officer was indicted for murder on Friday after his department cleared him for shooting an armed suspect.

The indictment stems from an April 3 shooting after 49-year-old Jeffrey Parker called police and told them he was armed and suicidal, according to AL.com.

Officers responded and tried talking to Parker as he confronted them while holding his gun.

The officers ordered Parker to drop his weapon, and he refused. Officer Darby then shot him.

One month after the shooting, the police department announced that Officer Darby was cleared of wrongdoing in the shooting.

Chief Mark McMurray told the media that the shooting was in accordance with his training. Officers do not have to wait for an armed person to point a weapon at them or shoot before using deadly force.

"Officer Darby was called upon to make split second decisions in a nightmare scenario, the likes of which most people will never experience. His training allowed him and his fellow officer to survive as he rushed bravely, without hesitation, into one of the most volatile and unpredictable situations a police officer is called upon to face," Chief McMurray said.

Huntsville Mayor Tommy Battle also released a statement in support of Officer Darby.

"Our hearts and sympathies are with the Parker family as they are forced to relive this time of loss. And to Officer Darby, you have our full support. As a valued and responsible member of our force, he acted in accordance with his training. Please accord him the same presumption of innocence as all Americans are entitled," the mayor said.

The reasoning behind the indictment is not clear, but statements from the prosecutor and family attorney suggest that they believe that mentally ill people cannot pose a deadly threat.

According to AL.com, Madison County District Attorney Rob Broussard told reporters that he was "gravely concerned" after seeing the details of the shooting, which caused them to believe it may not be justified.

The Parker family attorney told AL.com, "This incident centers on the growing concern about the mistreatment of the mentally ill by law enforcement. We have to put more resources into training law enforcement on how to deal with the mentally ill."

Comments
View Newer Messages
DWayne63
DWayne63

A mentally Ill man just killed an AZ DPS officer and wounded two more. That DA is insane. If the officer is smart he will demand an immediate bench trial.

KCN
KCN

I guess its come to the point where the Police Officer must review a persons confidential medical records before responding? It would then be the families of thosethe perp kills in the meantime that will sue. What is going on in this country when we jump to charging our protectors, due to pressure by protesters whom just like to stir the pot? It won't be long and LE will just put up their hands and say, "it's all yours, folks! Defend yourselves!" After all, why would people put themselves in harms way. It sure as hell isn't the best paying job out there. While anyone would agree that there is, and has been incidents where Officers were negligent and clearly should be held accountable. But if one has a gun. He doesn't drop it when told to and defies authority ( while holding this deadly weapon), he is posing a serious threat to all in the vicinity and must be stopped. Why so hard to understand? Common sense is way too uncommon these days. The criminal has all the advantages.

Capt mike
Capt mike

Another miscarriage of justice. obviously a liberal democrat district attorney who hates cops. Indictment is one thing, he should never be convicted in a trial

Righton17
Righton17

Might want to ask those oh so concerned family members what the hell a mentally challenged individual from their family was doing with a firearm to begin with. I know in my family if we had a member that we considered mentally unstable we would take his firearms and not allow him near one. Jesus, what were those people thinking?

pbm4jc
pbm4jc

"they believe that mentally ill people cannot pose a deadly threat."

Are they serious?

No. 21-30
Danielson6773
Danielson6773

I'm a use of force instructor at the state and federal level, the officer ABSOLUTELY can use deadly force regardless of mental illness. The decision is based on a person's actions and level of threat, not whether or not they may have a mental illness. The prosecutor is obviously doing this for political pressure or he is completely inexperienced in these matters. This is getting ridiculous that completely untrained people make decisions and have such strong opinions in something they know nothing about. Crazy

joaquinradioman
joaquinradioman

If someone is mentally ill and has a gun how in the hell can you say that the person isn't a threat...The family should be ashamed of itself along with the lawyer to base their lawsuit on this kind of BS!!!! He should and better be cleared!!!!

Spike1
Spike1

Hmmmph! That a mentally ill person cannot pose a threat is a big surprise to a lot of people, I bet . . . especially the ones who survived the psychiatric patient who went in the movie theater in Colorado and shot 82 folks!!

Inquirer63
Inquirer63

Unbelievable that the officer would charged when the individual had a gun in hand and refused instructions to put it down. The mentally ill can pose a serious threat to others not all do), and anyone acting irrationally with a gun in hand should be presumed to be a threat. The DA was not there and did not experience the tension of the situation.

jericho777
jericho777

"prosecutor and family attorney suggest that they believe that mentally ill people cannot pose a deadly threat."

You have got to be kidding me?! How insanely out of touch these people are!