NJ Fixes Law That Accidentally Banned Off-Duty Cops From Carrying Guns

State lawmakers passed a bill prohibiting off-duty officers from carrying their weapons.

Trenton, NJ – State lawmakers in New Jersey passed a new gun-control law in June that prohibits police officers from carrying their firearms while off duty.

Governor Phil Murphy signed the new law in June that was part of a package of bills designed to tighten the state’s strict gun laws, according to The Star Ledger.

The law changed the state limit from 15 rounds to 10 rounds and has a 180 day grace period for people to turn in the 10+ round magazines that are now illegal.

While the law allowed exceptions for retired law enforcement, it made no such exceptions for active-duty officers who carry their service weapons while not working.

Louis Bordi, the vice president of the New Jersey State Association of Chiefs of Police, told The Star Ledger that any officer possessing a weapon that has a magazine with more than 10 rounds could be violating the law. Bordi is also the chief of police in Voorhees Township.

Bordi told The Star Ledger that most police service weapons have magazines with 12 to 17 rounds. Bordi said police officers are never completely off the clock.

"They're required to act depending on what happens in front of them, and they need to be able to protect themselves and the community, even if they're off-duty," Bordi told The Star Ledger.

The state legislature voted July 26 to approve a new bill to clarify how the high-capacity magazine ban would apply to law enforcement, according to InsiderNJ.

State Senator Loretta Weinberg, a Democrat, was the sponsor of the bill. She said the latest vote was meant to “correct an oversight” that could stop police officers from carrying their guns while off duty, according to the Star Ledger.

“This bill will allow off-duty law enforcement officers to carry a firearm with an ammunition magazine capable of holding 17 rounds of ammunition or less,” said Weinberg, according to InsiderNJ. “The important clarification is that it also allows an off-duty officer to carry a firearm with an ammunition magazine holding more than 17 rounds but only if that firearm is issued by the officer’s employer. This restriction ensures that the officer is not limited by civilian restrictions, but we also are being responsible by not giving carte blanche to an unlimited number of sanctioned large-capacity magazines.”

Comments
No. 1-4
SGT_moore_USA
SGT_moore_USA

This 2 party political system is ridiculous. I am sick and tired of having our rights as Americans being in the balance of one f-head or another. Our founding fathers wrote the laws and our rights out! And this generation is trying to govern that those rights are wrong...I say send them all out and let the Constitution speak for our country. If you don’t like what it says, you can go to the UK. No guns there. I’m about to go to Switzerland, every citizen is encouraged to own and open carry firearms!

Hi_estComnDenomnn
Hi_estComnDenomnn

States should have absolutely no rights to makes laws concerning anything you have protected by the Constitution.

LordSeamus
LordSeamus

This is the stupidist state, next to California, in the USA. Even my home state isn't QUITE the stupid yet.

Burgers Allday
Burgers Allday

So, there was a small problem in the law and they quickly fixed it as soon as it was pointed out. Good, but not a huge deal.