Legislature Bars Sheriffs From Attending Because They Carry Guns

At least a dozen sheriffs were prohibited from attending the New Mexico governor's address on Tuesday.

Santa Fe, NM – Sheriffs from all over New Mexico were refused entry to the state legislature’s opening session on Tuesday because they were armed.

"We were allowed to go into the Roundhouse but we weren't allowed to go down onto the floor. We were directed to go to another room and watch what was going on from a TV," Cibola County Sheriff Tony Mace told KRQE.

"That has never happened to us before and that's a direct violation to the constitution of New Mexico. Not only that, the constitution of the United States, and that's just, as law enforcement officers, as peace officers, we carry weapons. That's just what we do," the sheriff continued.

In December of 2018, the Legislative Council voted to ban all weapons from the House of Representatives gallery during joint sessions, the Santa Fe New Mexican reported.

However, when the ban was enacted, nobody considered how that would affect armed law enforcement officers.

The result was that New Mexico State Police were put in the awkward position of having to ask sheriffs to disarm.

“This was not the intent,” Republican State Representative Rod Montoya told the Santa Fe New Mexican.

Approximately a dozen sheriffs, the highest-ranking law enforcement officers in their respective counties, were barred from attending New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan’s State of the State address on Jan. 15, KRQE reported.

"It only makes sense that if something is to happen, wouldn't you want sheriffs, your police chiefs, armed and ready to take action on this?" one of the sheriffs asked.

The mayor of Estancia, a small town in Torrance County, went to the state house on the first day of 2019 session to get a copy of the new rules banning weapons with his pistol on his hip.

Mayor Nathan Dial, 50, told Las Cruces Sun News that all he wanted was a piece of paper explaining the new rules.

Dial said nobody tried to disarm him, they just shuttled him off to one of three viewing rooms where the activities on the floor were being shown on television.

He told the Las Cruces Sun News that he was puzzled that guns were not banned in the viewing rooms inside the state house.

"If guns are such a threat, are [legislators] saying they are more important than their constituents in those rooms?" Dial asked.

The Capitol building’s superintendent, Raphael Baca, provided Dial with a copy of the new weapons ban about an hour after he arrived, the Las Cruces Sun News reported.

The mayor said he planned to post the ban on social media and talk to the National Rifle Association about it.

On Wednesday, Democratic Texas House Speaker Brian Egolf told the Santa Fe New Mexican that legislators planned to lift the ban for armed law enforcement for the remainder of the 60-day session.

Comments (29)
View Older Messages
Oldmp
Oldmp

This shit is getting crazy! Soon the idiots will have LE patrols return to station to the get their weapons from the locker when an incident goes down.😠

NTPD935Ret
NTPD935Ret

If you follow this webpage you would see that soon we won’t need guns because we won’t be able to use them. Ask the cops in New Hampshire!!!

MrsS
MrsS

Next, they'll be banning citizens and legal immigrants from attending...

THEDUKE
THEDUKE

seems to me the more armed LEO's in the audience the safer any others in the audience would be. Am I missing something?....hmm...No, I thought not.

Marxest
Marxest

Of course they knew how that would effect law enforcement officers. There just doing what American lawmakers have always done, making it difficult for everyone, including law enforcement.

rpdtransit
rpdtransit

They didn't disarm their security.

Grog
Grog

===[........when the ban was enacted, nobody considered how that would affect armed law enforcement officers.]=== BULL! You can be sure the liberals considered this and knew exactly what that meant!!!!

bunko376
bunko376

Remember this at "Election" Time !!! --(don't forget !! )

ilse
ilse

I would have walked out.

Pack
Pack

And yet the local police were allowed To have theirs? I think law enforcement officers should refuse to go help in places where guns are banned. Yes I know people will die, but I guess that’s the price society pays for their stupidity.

Sandman4x4
Sandman4x4

Now just wait a minute! If The Sheriff ARE the highest ranking members of the Law Enforcement Of their Counties, not to mention in the land, The Sheriff should have been able to attend with every Deputy he wanted. If refused? Arrest whomever was in deed refusing them lawful entry! Just one more example of the sickness called liberalism! Total hypocrisy carried to a extreme.

HH3
HH3

No weapon on the floor - - - -??? Yea right. I know that every one of the political "leaders" had those with weapons protecting them.

Another elitist action. What is good for me is not allowed by you. Don't you know who I am??????????? Puke

Please remind everyone at every election how important this is. Vote FREEDOM!!!

DocRyder
DocRyder

Explain again why a Sheriff's life is more important than mine? Where, in the Constitution, is Sheriff afforded additional 2nd Amendment Rights? What part of "...shall NOT be abridged." is so difficult to grasp?

tfort
tfort

Rules are rules. They apply to everyone. They should have been banned just for a dress code.