Lawmaker Pushes Law To Let Members Of Congress Drive With Flashing Blue Lights

North Carolina State Sen. Floyd McKissick said U.S. Rep. G.K. Butterfield asked him to introduce the legislation.

Raleigh, NC – A North Carolina lawmaker has proposed legislation that would allow the state’s members of Congress to drive with blue emergency lights flashing on top of their cars.

“There are frequently times when they're trying to meet deadlines," Democratic North Carolina State Senator Floyd McKissick explained, according to WRAL.

North Carolina State Senate Bill 618 includes only current members of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate.

And, under the new law, those members of Congress could only run the blue lights on their officially-registered vehicles – with a designated license plate - and only "in the performance of the member's official duties."

Current North Carolina law prohibits anyone who is not law enforcement from having a blue light on the roof of their vehicle. Doing so is a misdemeanor, WRAL reported.

SB 618 was co-sponsored by Republican State Senator Danny Britt

McKissick said it was his understanding that members of Congress were allowed to drive with blue lights in other states, WRAL reported.

However, Blue Lives Matter was unable to identify any states that allowed representatives and senators to utilize emergency lights on their personal vehicles.

McKissick said the request for the privilege of driving with blue lights on his personal vehicle had come from 1st District U.S. Representative G.K. Butterfield (D-North Carolina), WRAL reported.

"So they could get out of situations where their life would be at risk," the bill’s sponsor explained.

But Retired Washington Metro Transit Police Captain William Malone said putting elected officials behind the wheel during a crisis could be very dangerous.

Capt. Malone said law enforcement officers take an Emergency Vehicle Operator Course (EVOC) that teaches them how to safely navigate a vehicle during an emergency.

“If it’s that urgent for a politician to get somewhere, why not put them in the closest police car for the ride to the airport? Or have a state trooper detailed as their driver,” he proposed. “That way we don’t have to worry about whether the decision to use the lights is purely an ego thing.”

Cpt. Malone pointed out that other vehicles have a reaction to the lights as well – whether it be to slow down or move over – seeing those lights in the rear view mirror conveys a message to the drivers of the vehicles they get behind.

Scott MacLatchie, a law enforcement attorney, told WRAL that it would be too confusing for other drivers on the roads.

"It likely may confuse motorists," MacLatchie said. "Obviously if they're driving in the fast lane with a blue light on I'm assuming vehicles will pull over and get out of the way and maybe that's the intent of it but legally, they'd have to be operating within the speed limit."

Former Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt suffered a bi-partisan mocking by members of Congress in April of 2018 after it was revealed he repeatedly asked his detail to use lights and sirens to move him through traffic in the nation’s capital.

The New York Times reported that the then-EPA boss wanted to “use flashing lights and sirens in his motorcade... to expedite local trips in Washington to the airport or to dinner, including at least one trip to Le Diplomate, a trendy French restaurant that he frequented.”

The use of lights and sirens to bypass traffic was only one of the 23 ethics violations Pruitt was facing when he resigned in June of 2018.

Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle were amused and confused when they were asked if they would want to be able to use lights and sirens on their own vehicles, the Huffington Post reported.

“I didn’t know they stopped traffic for members or senators,” U.S. Senator Richard Shelby (R-Alabama) said. “I thought they stopped traffic for the President, foreign leaders and the Vice President.”

U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) laughed out loud when the question was posed, according to the Huffington Post.

Schatz said his driver used lights “based on the security circumstances, not your dinner schedule.”

“The only time they used blue lights was in case of emergency or real safety concerns,” he continued. “You never used it for convenience. It was not at your discretion as the protectee; it was the head of the detail that made a determination.”

Comments (56)
No. 1-25

They do realize that emergency vehicles don’t use flashing lights to ‘meet deadlines’ right?


These privileged "do nothings" have enough people working for them that they should be able to leave whatever it is they aren't doing to make the next session of "do nothing." The blue lights on police vehicles and other public safety vehicles are to enable the police to protect our citizens and our property. These lackluster politicians have ABSOLUTELY NO NEED NOR COMMON SENSE REASON that requires them to operate under emergency conditions unless we are being confronted with nuclear annihilation. Even then they would be operating emergency lights to get to a secure and safe bomb proof location to save their own worthless hides. The rest of the general public will be reduced to radioactive dust without a second thought from these pampered bureaucrats.


Give me a break!! You already have enough entitlements!! You don't need a flashing blue light on top of your private vehicle so you can now command the roads and highways! You already have way too much power as it is!! How about doing the job the tax payers are paying you for instead!! You sorry entitled piece of s--t!!


"Trying to meet deadlines..." How about leaving on time? Name another state..... These guys are morons. They are already think they are above the law and now they want to impersonate the law.


I'm absolutely against this it's not meant to meet deadlines, their not trained to drive in that manner and most don't have enough common sense to get in out of the rain much less drive a two ton vehicle at high speed.