Blue Lives Matter

City Orders Citizens To Give Up 'Assault Weapons' In City-Wide Ban

A city board in Illinois banned "assault weapons" on Monday night.

Deerfield, IL – The Deerfield Village Board ordered a ban on “assault weapons” on Monday night, and said they planned to implement a hefty fine on residents who refuse to comply.

The board unanimously voted to ban certain semi-automatic firearms, which they considered to be “assault weapons,” WLS reported.

The ordinance included semiautomatic rifles with fixed magazines capable of holding over 10 rounds of ammunition, and shotguns with revolving cylinders, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Rifles capable of accepting “large-capacity magazines” and a multitude of other features were also included in the ban, according to the paper.

The ban also hit some semiautomatic pistols, which primarily seemed to be targeting pistol variants of rifles and submachine guns. The ban covered pistols with off-hand gripping areas, barrel shrouds, or stocks.

"Large-capacity magazines" were defined as magazines that hold more than 10 bullets.

The amendment to the village’s gun ordinance also eradicated citizens’ rights to possess the magazines, WLS reported.

The board further declared that residents who refuse to comply with the ban will face a daily fine of up to $1,000.

Opponents of the ordinance argued that enacting the ban would actually leave the village less safe.

"You are the bureaucrats that Thomas Jefferson warned us about," Deerfield resident Dan Cox said. “Those that will strike away your rights, with the stroke of a pen.”

Resident James Smith agreed.

“This is oppression,” he told the board. “This is putting your thumb on people, and saying, ‘You are unworthy.’ This is bigotry.”

Resident Larry Nordahl cautioned that the ban was nothing more than a step towards future bans, according to the Deerfield Patch.

"First it's going to be assault rifles,” he warned. “Of course people who loath, hate, despise firearms are going to encourage new bans in the future. It's just a matter of time and the right political moment, the right political crisis."

Ninth-grader Cecilia Kowalik pointed out that the board’s decision to take weapons out of the hands of law-abiding citizens would do nothing to prevent criminals from causing harm to others.

"All too often we forget that criminals don't play by the rules,” she said. "These people are looking for populated groups with little to no protection, so this proposed ordinance will only serve to make us bigger targets and reduce the safety of the public in Deerfield."

Conversely, Deerfield High School student Ariella Kharasch thanked the board for their decision.

"This is our fight. This is our generation's fight, and we're going to keep fighting," she said.

Deerfield Village Manager Kent Street expressed hope that other areas of the country would follow Deerfield’s lead.

The ban is based off of a ban ordinance from Highland Park which survived a 2015 court battle that went to the U.S. Supreme Court.

"If Highland Park, if Deerfield, if more towns say no to this type of weapon, maybe the state of Illinois says no," he told WLS. "Maybe the federal government says no."

The board made one concession to the law, and said it would allow members of the military and retired law enforcement officers to retain their firearms, the Deerfield Patch reported.

The ban will go into effect June 13.

Comments
View Newer Messages
Hi_estComnDenomn
Hi_estComnDenomn

I'm confused, someone help me understand.

If the lawmakers are banning assault weapons in a suburb of Chicago, wouldn't that be a good thing? After all, all of you would agree that Chicago has high gun crime. Wouldn't be a way to curb some of that?

Ps2000man
Ps2000man

How about paying what the people dished out for the guns? No they just want to take them n say f u.. then all those guns will be sold. You think they will be destroyed? think again.

TexasGirl8
TexasGirl8

REVOLT! REVOLT! REVOLT!
Do these people not understand what the 2nd Amendment is for? If they want a bloody war, maybe we should give it to them. We can not allow this to happen, if we do, it will spread like fire. NIP IT IN THE BUD NOW! Anyone who thinks to come into MY home and take what IS MINE will not live another minute. I hope enough patriots stand up NOW and say "Enough is enough."

Dan360
Dan360

Did the Deerfield liberal politicians come together with an open mind in an effort to understand what our Founding Fathers intended when they added the 2nd. Amendment to the Bill of Rights? I really don't think so. I believe the Deerfield liberal politicians came together and worked with Lawyers for the sole purpose of pushing what everyone knows is the liberal agenda of making laws that will remove as many firearms from the hands of law-abiding citizens. I believe the following was from 'dailymail.com' not verbatim. "The Musklocks and flintlock pistols that our Founding Fathers used during that time in history were better firearms than they previously had, they witnessed those as advancements in firearms and knew more advancements in the firearm industry were to come." Those firearms were used by both the Military and the common man so to say that our Founding Fathers didn't mean for the common man to own those firearms is just not so. The Illinois firearm owners of today excluding those who may be grandfathered in, Police, and those with special firearm licenses do not own a Military style M16 that shoots automatic fire. The firearms that the Deerfield liberal politicians want to remove from the hands of its citizens are not just the AR & AK non-Military style rifles that liberals falsely claim to be the same as those used in the Military, there are also many handguns, rifles and some shotguns that the Military have never used but Deerfield liberal politicians deemed that responsible law-abiding citizens should not own because they said so. The 2nd. Amendment says "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" did they miss or not understand the meaning of "shall not be infringed". Attacking the rights of law-abiding citizens is not the answer, it's much easier though than trying to find out which criminals own firearms or to just blame the criminal who commits a mass shooting. Deerfield's liberal politicians are not only taking away the law-abiding citizen's right to own and to use their firearm in self-defense situations but also taking away the love and passion law-abiding citizens have for the shooting sports from competition shooting, hunting, target practice, or even those who collect firearms that Deerfield liberals added to their list, and I'm sure more will be added. Our Founding Fathers didn't fine, arrest and/or disarm responsible law-abiding citizens of their legally purchased firearms as Deerfield liberal politicians are doing today. Will "We The People" keep our Liberties and Freedoms, not if this continues, All those supporting the liberal agenda of disarming law-abiding of these United States has to be made known and their opponent supported when they're up for reelection. These Deerfield liberal politicians are weak and shouldn't be in a leadership position as their first response is to sacrifice our Freedoms, something our Founding Fathers would have never done and would never allow one like these to be in any leadership position in these United States and neither should we. God Bless America.

Southside Steve
Southside Steve

Like Leonidas the king of Sparta said to the Persians at Thermopylae...."Molon Labe...."Come and take them!"