2 Students Disciplined For Going To Gun Range Outside Of School Hours

Two students have been disciplined after pictures of them at the gun range came out.

Lacey Township, NJ - An attorney from a New Jersey gun organization association announced that a lawsuit may be pending after a school disciplined two students for going to a gun range outside of school hours.

Patch.com reported that attorney Daniel Schmutter, with the Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs, sent a letter to Lacey Township School District officials after two students posted pictures on Snapchat showing them at a gun range.

There was no threatening context to the pictures or anything that would otherwise cause alarm.

In the letter, Schmutter stated that suspending the two students for posting photos off school grounds and unrelated to school activities was a "very serious violation" of the their rights.

Schmutter said the students were both "straight-A" students, according to Patch.com. He also said that the students had attempted to return to school but were not allowed to go to classes.

The claims are that there is a school district policy which prohibits firearm possession by students on or off school grounds.

"These are top-quality kids," Schumuter said. "It's astonishing what they have done to these kids."

According to Patch.com, the Lacey Township school district follows the Safe Schools Initiative, the Zero Tolerance for Guns Act and also has its own zero-tolerance policy for any students who have weapons in their possession, on or off school grounds.

Students could be subject to a long-term suspension for up to one-year, according to Schmutter.

Anthony Muro posted the claim of the two students being suspended at 6:23 p.m. March 13 on the Lacey Township Chatter public Facebook group.

“INFO NEEDED: it is my understanding that two students at Lacey Township High School were placed on 5 days of detention for posting pictures on social media of firearms with the caption of "fun day at the range". If anyone has any more information regarding the validity or accuracy of this story, please let me know. I am currently under the impression that these kids were punished because someone was offended,” Muro posted.

Blue Lives Matter contacted Lacey Township High School and read Muro's post to Principal Gregory Brandis.

The principal said that Muro’s post was not accurate; however, he said he would not elaborate further and say what exactly was inaccurate because the matter involved high school students.

Patch.com reported that Superintendent Craig Wigley said the social media reports were not true, but would not comment on student matters.

NJ.com also tried to get more information on the story and was also shot down by the school district.

Frank Horvath posted on the Lacey Township page and said he spoke to the superintendent, and that the superintendent would not confirm or deny the story.

“He did state that since the Parkland shooting, they have received many requests to look into social media posts, some that seemed valid, and some that seemed to prove not too, including bringing up posts from as far back as November,” Horvath posted. “I don't know why, but something tells me that he is getting pressured by others in the board or outside influences to ‘make a statement’ about ‘zero tolerance of guns.’”

A student responded on the page and said the rumor was true, and that his classmates had been disciplined.

“To those questioning the validity of this situation, this is 100% true, my two class mates posted photos/videos of them at a shooting range, and got in trouble because of it,” John Carr posted.

Jack Pyle, a trustee for the Coalition of New Jersey Firearm Owners, said in an email to Blue Lives Matter that his organization has received reports that students at the school district have been threatened over other gun-related issues.

Pyle said that parents have said their sons have been threatened with suspension, disciplinary action or detentions for similar photos posted on social media and for having NRA logos or similar images on their personal vehicles.

Comments
No. 1-25
Skipper
Skipper

Where is the ACLJ in all of this? It should be right up their alley.

Datrebor
Datrebor

How in the world can this school even think about violating these students 2nd Amendment Rights? When they are off school grounds the school should not be able to tell them how to live their lives. That is up to the parents, period.

lmr111702
lmr111702

You cannot tell these students what they cannot do off of school grounds and on their own time. There are some SERIOUS civil rights violations going on here, AND these boys have a RIGHT to their education too, so someone is in deep shit for this one. i hope the parents sue the living daylights out of that school district, the superintendent, and the school board. Enough is enough!

Steve1
Steve1

Sue the hell out of the school!!!!!!!

bronx163
bronx163

First school is for reading writting and arithmatic.
It is not a re-education camp for shitbag liberals.

Second these kids are American citizens and have the right to do what ever they want under the law and the constitution.

3thd school has nonauthority what a child or parent does off school grounds. This is not nazi germany or russia and or china.

Last this school and township should be sued for civil rights violations.
They attacked American citizens for exercising their right to bear arms.
They violated first amendment right.
They violated their privacy.
And character assassination and malice.
School labels them a threat for exercising their right to bear arms and enjoying recreational shooting.
Sue the balls off the school and township and administrators who suspended these kids.