Blue Lives Matter

2 San Diego Officers Shot During Standoff That Left Gunman Dead

A gunman opened fire on San Diego police and firefighters on Saturday night and wounded two officers.

San Diego, CA – Two San Diego police officers were shot at an apartment complex as they responded to a disturbance call on Saturday night.

The incident began at 10:15 p.m., when police arrived at the Tuscany Place apartments and smelled smoke coming from a first-floor unit, The San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

The officers requested assistance from the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department, and firefighters accompanied them as they went to the apartment to make contact with someone inside, according to KNSD.

A neighbor told The San Diego Union-Tribune that he heard them knocking on the gunman’s door repeatedly, and that they ultimately used an ax to get inside.

“As soon as they open the door, they were met with gunfire,” San Diego Police Chief David Nisleit said during a press conference.

“I heard them bashing on the door, then I heard gunfire,” the neighbor said. “There was plaster from my wall on my couch and carpet.”

The gunman, who police later learned was wearing body armor, fired through the walls, wounding two of the officers, FOX News reported.

“It was fast,” neighbor Matthew Rezrouch told The San Diego Union-Tribune. “They were screaming ‘two officers down, bleeding!’”

One officer was able to return fire, Chief Nisleit confirmed, according to The San Diego Union-Tribune.

The wounded officers and at least one firefighter were removed from the complex using a ladder.

They were rushed to a local hospital, where one was listed in serious but stable condition, and the other was listed in stable condition, Chief Nisleit said.

According to FOX News, one of the officers was shot in the chest. The other sustained a gunshot wound to the shoulder.

One of the officers is a three-year veteran of the force and the other has been with the department for 18 years, the chief said.

Officers rushed to the apartment complex and began evacuating tenants in the 100-unit building as the barricaded gunman remained holed up in his residence, The San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

A SWAT team also rescued a firefighter from a unit near the shooter, after he was forced to take cover during the gunfight, according to KNSD.

Police took a suspect into custody at 11:20 p.m., but quickly ascertained that he was not the gunman, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

At approximately 12:15 a.m., a tactical robot was able to push past the suspect’s door, and a camera mounted on the device showed the shooter lying on the floor with head trauma, police said.

A K9 officer was later sent into the apartment, but the gunman did not respond when the K9 bit him in the leg.

Just before 1 a.m., police determined that the shooter was dead.

It was unclear whether he was killed during the gunfight, or if the fatal wound was self-inflicted.

Police did not release the shooter’s identity and have not confirmed that he was the 30-year-old male who resided at the apartment, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

Other tenants said that they and been warned about a “weird guy” who lived in the complex and said they heard the man screaming and yelling at times.

One resident told the San Diego Union Tribune that the man had been placed in a psychiatric hospital approximately 18 months ago, after he bored a hole through his wall.

Comments
View Newer Messages
Burgers Allday
Burgers Allday

now, mrs10 -- that is like saying lets legalize meth because only law breakers take that drug anyway. with better gun control, there will be fewer guns out there, they will be harder to get and many, many criminals don't do things that take a lot of effort. another good measure would be mandatory insurance.

Mrs10
Mrs10

@Burgers Allday - while I know you use this argument by cut-and-paste without worrying too much about relevance, I'll answer for those who don't know you do that all the time and who may possibly be asking the same questions.

  1. As to the question whether this debate should be about Federal or State - doesn't matter bc the state's laws can be MORE restrictive than Federal not vise versa so we can say Federal for sake of argument because they will be the set of laws will the least restriction relative to each other.
  2. Whether Federal or State limited gun ownership/restricted gun or magazine sales will not change current crimes rates as referring to LAW BREAKERS who commit crimes using guns. LAW ABIDING CITIZENS should be treated as such and restricting their gun rights based on actions of those who don't follow CURRENT LAW makes no sense.

Put in very small words: Bad people who break the law NOW aren't going to STOP breaking it if NEW laws are in place.

Hi_estComnDenomn
Hi_estComnDenomn

@Heezels From you? Not at all.

Heezels
Heezels

Lol, he didn’t say they didn’t have strict gun laws, which is what you’re saying. You’re saying they were calling them lax. They’re saying the exact opposite. It’s despite their strict gun laws Chicago has terrible gun crime.

Of course if it is proven that Chicago does have lax gun laws that’s a valuable point.

But aside from that I’m just calling you out on your BS, which it looks like you clearly didn’t appreciate. I’m trying to help facilitate a more appropriate conversation, but I guess you don’t care about that.

Hi_estComnDenomn
Hi_estComnDenomn

@Heezels oh, shut the fuck up. here is the first line of the argument.

"The assault weapons ban didn't work. Criminals ignore laws. Visit Chicago - very strict gun laws, more shootings than anywhere."

Follow the conversation and stop being distracted by blinky lights. Once Trumpito couldn't follow up, he started talking about immigration. He got checked, and changed the subject.

Heezels
Heezels

You’re having two different conversations. One on Chicago gun laws being lax. I’m not sure why that’s the topic of conversation. It seems that everyone agrees that they’re not.

The other conversation is that criminals will get guns anyway they can, that’s easier.

The only difference here is the political nature of the bias. You’re both right and both trying to mislead the other.

Hi_estComnDenomn
Hi_estComnDenomn

@Thinblueline So do you also believe that Chicago gun laws are lax? because that's what we're talking about. They're following Illinois gun laws to the letter. They are also following Indiana gun laws by being able to walk in and buy without so much as a pause. Please try to pay attention.

No. 11-20
Thinblueline
Thinblueline

I am following along took, so criminals do not follow gun laws, correct? Ass clown.

Hi_estComnDenomn
Hi_estComnDenomn

@Thinblueline he said that Chicago gun laws are lax. They are most definitely not. Criminals get their guns from Indiana. Try to follow along, chubs.

Thinblueline
Thinblueline

So what you’re saying HCD is that criminals will be criminals no matter what the law is?