Blue Lives Matter

2 San Diego Officers Shot During Standoff That Left Gunman Dead

A gunman opened fire on San Diego police and firefighters on Saturday night and wounded two officers.

San Diego, CA – Two San Diego police officers were shot at an apartment complex as they responded to a disturbance call on Saturday night.

The incident began at 10:15 p.m., when police arrived at the Tuscany Place apartments and smelled smoke coming from a first-floor unit, The San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

The officers requested assistance from the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department, and firefighters accompanied them as they went to the apartment to make contact with someone inside, according to KNSD.

A neighbor told The San Diego Union-Tribune that he heard them knocking on the gunman’s door repeatedly, and that they ultimately used an ax to get inside.

“As soon as they open the door, they were met with gunfire,” San Diego Police Chief David Nisleit said during a press conference.

“I heard them bashing on the door, then I heard gunfire,” the neighbor said. “There was plaster from my wall on my couch and carpet.”

The gunman, who police later learned was wearing body armor, fired through the walls, wounding two of the officers, FOX News reported.

“It was fast,” neighbor Matthew Rezrouch told The San Diego Union-Tribune. “They were screaming ‘two officers down, bleeding!’”

One officer was able to return fire, Chief Nisleit confirmed, according to The San Diego Union-Tribune.

The wounded officers and at least one firefighter were removed from the complex using a ladder.

They were rushed to a local hospital, where one was listed in serious but stable condition, and the other was listed in stable condition, Chief Nisleit said.

According to FOX News, one of the officers was shot in the chest. The other sustained a gunshot wound to the shoulder.

One of the officers is a three-year veteran of the force and the other has been with the department for 18 years, the chief said.

Officers rushed to the apartment complex and began evacuating tenants in the 100-unit building as the barricaded gunman remained holed up in his residence, The San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

A SWAT team also rescued a firefighter from a unit near the shooter, after he was forced to take cover during the gunfight, according to KNSD.

Police took a suspect into custody at 11:20 p.m., but quickly ascertained that he was not the gunman, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

At approximately 12:15 a.m., a tactical robot was able to push past the suspect’s door, and a camera mounted on the device showed the shooter lying on the floor with head trauma, police said.

A K9 officer was later sent into the apartment, but the gunman did not respond when the K9 bit him in the leg.

Just before 1 a.m., police determined that the shooter was dead.

It was unclear whether he was killed during the gunfight, or if the fatal wound was self-inflicted.

Police did not release the shooter’s identity and have not confirmed that he was the 30-year-old male who resided at the apartment, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

Other tenants said that they and been warned about a “weird guy” who lived in the complex and said they heard the man screaming and yelling at times.

One resident told the San Diego Union Tribune that the man had been placed in a psychiatric hospital approximately 18 months ago, after he bored a hole through his wall.

Comments
View Newer Messages
Hi_estComnDenomn
Hi_estComnDenomn

@realDonaldTrump 😂 youre the same person, don't act like this isn't a dick flute solo.

Hi_estComnDenomn
Hi_estComnDenomn

@LEO0301 But everyone else is talking about gun laws in Illinois and Indiana. What are you talking about?

Would you like to change the subject?

LEO0301
LEO0301

@Hi_estComnDenomn - I said that was a contributing cause. In places like Chicago even if guns weren't available, I can guarantee you the same people would find another way to kill you.

Hi_estComnDenomn
Hi_estComnDenomn

@LEO0301 So is your answer to my question of where criminals get their guns; straw purchases, thefts, and burglaries?

No. 11-20
LEO0301
LEO0301

@Hi_estComnDenomn - Well, straw purchases, thefts and burglaries is certainly a big problem, but really the main issue has to do with a race of people who have no respect for human life. A gun is an inanimate object that can't hurt anyone unless the trigger is pulled. The human element, Felon, the human element.

Hi_estComnDenomn
Hi_estComnDenomn

@LEO0301 There's a gap in your story. If a neighboring state can get guns and all they need is ID and a check through NICS (which we all know works every single time, right??) where are the criminals getting their guns from? In your answer, also try to factor in private sales.

Let's see if you can give a concise answer without waving your magic wand.

LEO0301
LEO0301

@Hi_estComnDenomn - To purchase a long gun (rifle, shotgun) you must be at least 18 years old and a resident of Indiana or a bordering state (Illinois residents may face restrictions). To buy a handgun you must be at least 21 years old and a resident of Indiana. You also must present a valid photo ID that includes your current address (drivers license, state ID card, military ID with current orders). A potential buyer must also submit to an in-store instant FBI criminal background check known as a "national instant criminal search" or "NICS". The check takes about 5 minutes to perform. If you have been convicted of a felony or a domestic abuse charge you are ineligible to buy a gun.

You cannot buy a gun in Indiana "like a loaf of bread". The problem in Chicago and it's extremely high murder rate boils down to one thing - a race of people who have no respect for human life. Pay attention to what's going on Felon.

Burgers Allday
Burgers Allday

now, mrs10 -- that is like saying lets legalize meth because only law breakers take that drug anyway. with better gun control, there will be fewer guns out there, they will be harder to get and many, many criminals don't do things that take a lot of effort. another good measure would be mandatory insurance.

Mrs10
Mrs10

@Burgers Allday - while I know you use this argument by cut-and-paste without worrying too much about relevance, I'll answer for those who don't know you do that all the time and who may possibly be asking the same questions.

  1. As to the question whether this debate should be about Federal or State - doesn't matter bc the state's laws can be MORE restrictive than Federal not vise versa so we can say Federal for sake of argument because they will be the set of laws will the least restriction relative to each other.
  2. Whether Federal or State limited gun ownership/restricted gun or magazine sales will not change current crimes rates as referring to LAW BREAKERS who commit crimes using guns. LAW ABIDING CITIZENS should be treated as such and restricting their gun rights based on actions of those who don't follow CURRENT LAW makes no sense.

Put in very small words: Bad people who break the law NOW aren't going to STOP breaking it if NEW laws are in place.